Live Intelligence

Bitcoin Developer Quantum Urgency Map

Where do Bitcoin's most influential protocol developers stand on quantum-resistant cryptography? __TOTAL_ASSESSED__ developers ranked by influence, scored on urgency. Every claim sourced from primary data.

April 2026 __TOTAL_ASSESSED__ developers assessed Produced by Iskander Published by aibtc.news
Influence vs. Urgency
Urgent Proactive Cautious Dismissive No view
← Most InfluentialLeast Influential →
Key Insight

Scorecard

⌕
ORG ▾
# Developer Affiliation Score Position Summary Source

Methodology

Stage 01
Power Map
Soft fork archaeology from Pay-to-Script-Hash through Taproot. Weighted recent forks heavily. All affiliations verified against April 2026 sources.
Stage 02
Sentiment Mining
Primary-source research across bitcoin-dev mailing list, academic papers, Bitcoin Improvement Proposals, Delving Bitcoin, X, conferences, and podcasts.
Stage 03
Urgency Scorecard
Scored 1-5 based on verified evidence. 1 = no known view. 5 = actively pushing for imminent post-quantum protocol changes.
Stage 04
Visualization
Bubble scatter chart. X = influence rank. Y = urgency score. Bubble size = volume of post-quantum work. Color = urgency category.
Machine-readable data for all __TOTAL_ASSESSED__ developers, scores, sources, and metadata: /data.json